Rendered at 00:31:23 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
BariumBlue 23 minutes ago [-]
Yeah, it's a bit of an awkward article. Just compare the paragraph headers to the paragraph contents - "Why a hex grid" and then the paragraph doesn't talk about hex grids.
AI stylisms are not necessarily bad - short, punchy fragments CAN make it easier to digest some text. But it can't be all punch. In a meandering writing (like this post), it comes off as unfocused and as a blasé imitation of actually focused, to-the-point, punchy writing.
It gives off of similar vibes as corporateese - like someone who kinda knows what "right/smart/good" sounds like, but doesn't or can't present something actually right/smart/good.
EDIT: Not that there isn't interesting stuff worth reading, but it does feel a little "someone put a big mac in a blender and I guess it's still decent".
johnfn 1 hours ago [-]
The blog post is entirely AI generated.
Hammershaft 60 minutes ago [-]
I think the author is selecting good gifs and structuring arguments, but the prose is painfully AI generated.
pevansgreenwood 48 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
JumpCrisscross 36 minutes ago [-]
Cool, every kid who’s dropped a bomb in a computer game is apparently a war criminal.
AI stylisms are not necessarily bad - short, punchy fragments CAN make it easier to digest some text. But it can't be all punch. In a meandering writing (like this post), it comes off as unfocused and as a blasé imitation of actually focused, to-the-point, punchy writing.
It gives off of similar vibes as corporateese - like someone who kinda knows what "right/smart/good" sounds like, but doesn't or can't present something actually right/smart/good.
EDIT: Not that there isn't interesting stuff worth reading, but it does feel a little "someone put a big mac in a blender and I guess it's still decent".